| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
| Cc: | Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error on failed COMMIT |
| Date: | 2021-01-22 14:27:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoCrfs+m86-7Y_ph2ifqvn8MegtGnzC3gA+3pN3jSwfD8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:29 PM Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> wrote:
>
> I could if someone wants to commit to reviewing it.
> I've updated it a number of times but it seems nobody wants to review it.
Since this has a long thread, how about summarizing what consensus we
reached and what discussion we still need if any so that new reviewers
can easily catch up? I think people who want to start reviewing are
likely to search the patch marked as "Needs Review". So I think
continuous updating and rebasing the patch would help get the patch
reviewed also in terms of that.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-01-22 14:28:46 | Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-01-22 14:27:00 | Re: plpgsql variable assignment not supporting distinct anymore |