From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix crash when non-creator being an iteration on shared radix tree |
Date: | 2024-12-26 16:59:20 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoCfCYU6RJLm5aSNad+33R6uqjXAa1EdQSKDGA1Ro0p7bA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 9:55 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 2:17 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 2:27 AM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > v3-0001 allocates the iter data in the caller's context. It's a small
> > > patch, but still a core behavior change so proposed for master-only. I
> > > believe your v1 is still the least invasive fix for PG17.
> >
> > I agree to use v1 for v17.
>
> Okay, did you want to commit that separately, or together with my 0001
> on master? Either way, I've put a bit more effort into the commit
> message in v4 and adjusted the comment slightly.
I think we can commit them separately. It's a pure bug fix for back
branches while for HEAD it removes the bug by an improvement.
>
> > > It's trivial after 0001-02: 0003 removes makes one test use slab as
> > > the passed context (only 32-bit systems would actually use it
> > > currently).
> >
> > These changes make sense to me. Here are a few comments:
> >
> > RT_RADIX_TREE has 'leaf_context' but it seems that we use it only for
> > local memory. Do we want to declare only in the !RT_SHMEM case?
>
> That's already the case, if I understand your statement correctly.
True. Sorry, I misunderstood something.
>
> > ---
> > /*
> > * Similar to TidStoreCreateLocal() but create a shared TidStore on a
> > * DSA area. The TID storage will live in the DSA area, and the memory
> > * context rt_context will have only meta data of the radix tree.
> > *
> > * The returned object is allocated in backend-local memory.
> > */
> >
> > We need to update the comment about rt_context too since we no longer
> > use rt_context for shared tidstore.
>
> Fixed.
The three patches look good to me.
> BTW, it seems TidStore.context is unused?
Indeed. We can remove it.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-12-26 17:58:11 | Re: PoC: history of recent vacuum/checkpoint runs (using new hooks) |
Previous Message | wenhui qiu | 2024-12-26 16:00:36 | Re: PoC: history of recent vacuum/checkpoint runs (using new hooks) |