Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:38 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:17 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:50 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I saw a SIGSEGV there when using tidstore to write a fix for something else.
> > > > Patch attached.
> > >
> > > Great find, thank you for the patch!
> >
> > +1
> >
> > (This occurred to me a few days ago, but I was far from my computer.)
> >
> > With the purge function that Noah proposed, I believe we can also get
> > rid of the comment at the top of the .sql test file warning of a
> > maintenance hazard:
> > ..."To avoid adding duplicates,
> > -- each call to do_set_block_offsets() should use different block
> > -- numbers."
>
> Good point. Removed.
>
> >
> > > of do_gset_block_offset() and check_set_block_offsets(). If these are
> > > annoying, we can remove the cases of array[1] and array[1,2].
> >
> > Let's keep those -- 32-bit platforms should also exercise this path.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I've attached a new patch. I'll push it tonight, if there is no further comment.
>

Pushed.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com