| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
| Date: | 2023-02-10 07:15:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoC_XQFZTTfE63Yi7AwcSucEHJZX7+Mrg8SicrJbrDouZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 3:51 PM John Naylor
<john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:08 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > query: select * from bench_tidstore_load(0, 10 * 1000 * 1000)
> >
> > v15:
> > load_ms
> > ---------
> > 816
>
> How did you build the tid store and test on v15? I first tried to apply v15-0009-PoC-lazy-vacuum-integration.patch, which conflicts with vacuum now, so reset all that, but still getting build errors because the tid store types and functions have changed.
I applied v26-0008-Add-TIDStore-to-store-sets-of-TIDs-ItemPointerDa.patch
on top of v15 radix tree and changed the TidStore so that it uses v15
(non-templated) radixtree. That way, we can test TidStore using v15
radix tree. I've attached the patch that I applied on top of
v26-0008-Add-TIDStore-to-store-sets-of-TIDs-ItemPointerDa.patch.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| change_tidstore_for_v15.patch | application/octet-stream | 10.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-02-10 07:43:15 | Re: Fix GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL test scenario in 003_check_guc.pl |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2023-02-10 07:10:53 | Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication |