From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bogus assert in logicalmsg_desc |
Date: | 2022-08-15 01:13:35 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoC9vzYzcgz+kpp5pn8QJQPEk+qwruExSbHeKxwdK9939Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 1:17 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while experimenting with logical messages, I ran into this assert in
> logicalmsg_desc:
>
> Assert(prefix[xlrec->prefix_size] != '\0');
>
> This seems to be incorrect, because LogLogicalMessage does this:
>
> xlrec.prefix_size = strlen(prefix) + 1;
>
> So prefix_size includes the null byte, so the assert points out at the
> first payload byte. And of course, the check should be "==" because we
> expect the byte to be \0, not the other way around.
>
> It's pretty simple to make this crash by writing a logical message where
> the first payload byte is \0, e.g. like this:
>
> select pg_logical_emit_message(true, 'a'::text, '\x00'::bytea);
>
> and then running pg_waldump on the WAL segment.
>
> Attached is a patch addressing this. This was added in 14, so we should
> backpatch to that version.
+1
The patch looks good to me.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2022-08-15 01:20:28 | Re: bogus assert in logicalmsg_desc |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2022-08-14 16:54:42 | Re: Include the dependent extension information in describe command. |