Re: [HACKERS] Creating backup history files for backups taken from standbys

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Creating backup history files for backups taken from standbys
Date: 2018-01-11 10:10:50
Message-ID: CAD21AoC4JBQaixOSk60_iEuU2ciNYJVTSadCZDxZVMBYtaMj4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 1:35 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 1/6/18 3:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Which also makes it a smaller and clearer patch
>>
>>
>> Yes, this generates less diffs, reducing the likelihood of bugs. What
>> do you think about the v3 attached?
>
>
> I agree that this is a cleaner solution.
>

+1. And the changes looks good to me.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2018-01-11 10:14:06 Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-01-11 10:00:16 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning