Re: subscription worker doesn't start immediately on eabled

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: subscription worker doesn't start immediately on eabled
Date: 2017-05-08 03:21:28
Message-ID: CAD21AoBroGH6BMzgE+8WXmvow7wg1b5y2u24aB-Ucv2=vzgxiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/27/17 21:36, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> That makes sense to me. Since NOCONNECT option changes some default
>> values including ENABLED to false I think we should apply it also when
>> NOCONNECT is specified?
>
> That's not necessary, because if NOCONNECT is specified, then "enabled"
> will be set accordingly.
>

You're right, sorry for the noise. Anyway thank you for committing the patch!

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-05-08 03:42:45 Re: pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-05-08 03:18:54 Re: PG 10 release notes