From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix typo about generate_gather_paths |
Date: | 2021-02-01 02:44:33 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoAw0DrJVmZWe2pkw=rOaQKGNLUzeGUQG=dkJg-6hfM+-A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 3:24 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 3:21 AM, Hou, Zhijie wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Since ba3e76c,
> > the optimizer call generate_useful_gather_paths instead of generate_gather_paths() outside.
> >
> > But I noticed that some comment still talking about generate_gather_paths not generate_useful_gather_paths.
> > I think we should fix these comment, and I try to replace these " generate_gather_paths " with " generate_useful_gather_paths "
> >
>
> Thanks. I started looking at this a bit more closely, and I think most
> of the changes are fine - the code was changed to call a different
> function, but the comments still reference generate_gather_paths().
>
> The one exception seems to be create_ordered_paths(), because that
> comment also makes statements about what generate_gather_pathes is
> doing. And some of it does not apply to generate_useful_gather_paths.
> For example it says it generates order-preserving Gather Merge paths,
> but generate_useful_gather_paths also generates paths with sorts (which
> are clearly not order-preserving).
>
> So I think this comment will need a bit more work to update ...
Status update for a commitfest entry.
This patch has been "Waiting on Author" without seeing any activity
since Tomas sent review comments. I'm planning to set it to "Returned
with Feedback”, barring objections.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-02-01 02:46:15 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion during partition pruning |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-02-01 02:42:32 | Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs? |