Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:10 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:47 PM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the rebased version.
> >
> > At Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:59:36 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAD21AoC_s0H0x-dDPhVJEqMYcnKYOMjESXd6r_9bbc3ZZegg1A(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > > Thank you for the notice. Rebased.
> >
> > + <term><replaceable class="parameter">integer</replaceable></term>
> > + <listitem>
> > + <para>
> > + Specifies parallel degree for <literal>PARALLEL</literal> option. The
> > + value must be at least 1. If the parallel degree
> > + <replaceable class="parameter">integer</replaceable> is omitted, then
> > + <command>VACUUM</command> decides the number of workers based on number of
> > + indexes on the relation which further limited by
> > + <xref linkend="guc-max-parallel-workers-maintenance"/>.
> > + </para>
> > + </listitem>
> > + </varlistentry>
> >
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patch.
>
> > I'm quite confused to see this. I suppose the <para> should be a
> > description about <integer> parameters. Actually the existing
> > <boolean> entry is describing the boolean itself.
> >
>
> Indeed. How about the following description?
>

Attached the updated version patches.
Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center