Re: optimize lookups in snapshot [sub]xip arrays

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: optimize lookups in snapshot [sub]xip arrays
Date: 2022-08-09 01:57:44
Message-ID: CAD21AoA_MEAENt9yaS5-rQ+_4yW4+GTYN16Jy0ntY+o8o7TtKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 7:33 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:46:48PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> > Okay, I think it's basically in good shape. Since it should be a bit
> > faster than a couple versions ago, would you be up for retesting with
> > the original test having 8 to 512 writers?
>
> Sure thing. The results are similar. As before, the improvements are most
> visible when the arrays are large.
>
> writers head patch
> 8 672 680
> 16 639 664
> 32 701 689
> 64 705 703
> 128 628 653
> 256 576 627
> 512 530 584
> 768 450 536
> 1024 350 494
>
> > And also add the const
> > markers we discussed upthread?
>
> Oops, sorry about that. This is done in v9.
>
> > Aside from that, I plan to commit this
> > week unless there is further bikeshedding.
>
> Great, thanks.

The patch looks good to me. One minor point is:

+ * IDENTIFICATION
+ * src/port/pg_lfind.h

The path doesn't match to the actual file path, src/include/port/pg_lfind.h.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-08-09 02:24:46 Re: Fix unmatched file identifications
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-08-09 01:57:20 Fix unmatched file identifications