| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication timeout problem |
| Date: | 2022-05-09 08:46:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoAOmB2eEMGw0Xpcf4EwkTvTYzxEYj=5CR1kz7rA5UDPGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 3:47 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:42 PM wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:54 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:32 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, shall we go back to the previous approach of using a separate
> > > > > > function update_replication_progress?
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, agreed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Attached, please find the updated patch accordingly. Currently, I have
> > > > prepared it for HEAD, if you don't see any problem with this, we can
> > > > prepare the back-branch patches based on this.
> > >
> > > Thank you for updating the patch. Looks good to me.
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > Improve the back-branch patches according to the discussion.
> >
>
The patches look good to me too.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-05-09 08:56:03 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-05-09 08:02:06 | Indent C code in flex and bison files |