From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups |
Date: | 2017-05-12 02:44:19 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoA15xsu1gbOH=L1XU7g7zuKk1UACtOz+-mqOwP1_xBC_g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had my eyes on the WAL sender code this morning, and I have noticed
> that walsender.c is not completely consistent with the PID lookups it
> does in walsender.c. In two code paths, the PID value is checked
> without holding the WAL sender spin lock (WalSndRqstFileReload and
> pg_stat_get_wal_senders), which looks like a very bad idea contrary to
> what the new WalSndWaitStopping() does and what InitWalSenderSlot() is
> doing for ages.
>
> Any thoughts about the patch attached to make things more consistent?
> It seems to me that having some safeguards would be nice for
> robustness.
+1. I think this is a sensible change.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-12 02:46:45 | Re: WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-12 02:38:37 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |