| From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "m(dot)usama(at)gmail(dot)com" <m(dot)usama(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com" <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "ildar(at)adjust(dot)com" <ildar(at)adjust(dot)com>, "horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com" <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
| Date: | 2021-10-05 01:38:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoA-niX1ho6kKbCkU4XfOrARV0rhSov0CkKekFF2ogyX_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sawada-san,
>
> I noticed that this thread and its set of patches have been marked with "Returned with Feedback" by yourself.
> I find the feature (atomic commit for foreign transactions) very useful
> and it will pave the road for having a distributed transaction management in Postgres.
> Although we have not arrived at consensus at which approach is best,
> there were significant reviews and major patch changes in the past 2 years.
> By any chance, do you have any plans to continue this from where you left off?
As I could not reply to the review comments from Fujii-san for almost
three months, I don't have enough time to move this project forward at
least for now. That's why I marked this patch as RWF. I’d like to
continue working on this project in my spare time but I know this is
not a project that can be completed by using only my spare time. If
someone wants to work on this project, I’d appreciate it and am happy
to help.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-10-05 01:58:39 | Re: corruption of WAL page header is never reported |
| Previous Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2021-10-05 01:27:13 | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |