From: | sud <suds1434(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Trigger usecase |
Date: | 2024-07-30 18:46:01 |
Message-ID: | CAD=mzVVOC=H9zhYn5YF74XMV+7023f5hPvcroSaQu61m7q-yCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:54 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
wrote:
>
> It is largely a matter of taste.
>
> The advantage of a trigger is that it works even if somebody bypasses the
> application
> to insert data.
>
> I think that triggers are easy to debug, but again, that's a matter of
> taste.
>
>
> Thank you David and Laurenz.
Creating triggers to populates some audit table or say populating data in
audit columns (created_by, updated_by,created_date,updated_date) is fine i
believe, however this use case was to load/persist data in table with SCD-2
style, so is it good idea to use the trigger for such use case?
Not sure of the exact pros and cons, but we were following certain rules
like , if it's business logic which needs to be implemented in Database,
then it should not be done using triggers but rather should be done through
database procedure/functions. Hope this understanding correct.
Regards
Sud
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-07-30 18:50:48 | Re: Trigger usecase |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-07-30 17:24:06 | Re: Trigger usecase |