From: | Subhash Udata <subhashudata(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Questions on Upgrading PostgreSQL from 15.0 to 15.9 and Setting Up Streaming Replication |
Date: | 2024-11-24 17:16:21 |
Message-ID: | CAD=40Z33zWtPmCa5bhtJaQR26CR4bXxBkYKUE1MXZ5JDFv6Qsg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you, everyone, for your valuable clarifications and insights. Your
guidance has been incredibly helpful in addressing my concerns and
understanding the best approach to proceed.
I truly appreciate the time and effort you’ve taken to assist me.
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 at 22:36, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 24, 2024, at 09:03, Subhash Udata <subhashudata(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > When we shut down the standby, upgrade it, and then start it back up,
> will the replication automatically resume from the primary to the standby?
>
> Assuming that the standby has access to any WAL generated during the
> shutdown (either still in the primary's WAL directory, or via an archive
> using archive_command), yes. If you are not using a WAL archive using
> archive_command, you will want to make sure your wal_keep_size parameter is
> set high enough that required WAL segments aren't recycled during the
> standby's downtime.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christophe Pettus | 2024-11-24 19:54:52 | Re: Questions on Upgrading PostgreSQL from 15.0 to 15.9 and Setting Up Streaming Replication |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-11-24 17:15:27 | Re: Questions on Upgrading PostgreSQL from 15.0 to 15.9 and Setting Up Streaming Replication |