Re: libpq compression (part 3)

From: Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq compression (part 3)
Date: 2024-01-12 21:02:47
Message-ID: CACzsqT6n0WNUGAK4R+Pn52+hAKWuinMqEjKnfkYkx9EroMwXeA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I wonder if we could use "upstream" and "downstream" to be clearer? Or
> some other terminology?

What about `send` and `receive`?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2024-01-12 21:05:35 Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-01-12 21:00:35 Re: Stack overflow issue