Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql

From: Michel Pelletier <pelletier(dot)michel(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
Date: 2025-01-21 18:05:48
Message-ID: CACxu=vKModwqSpEjpn-ur1uMAEYkcd-i8CvNsH-z9=dk7F7YQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:09 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I noticed that v2 of this patch series failed to apply after
> 7b27f5fd3, so here's v3. No non-trivial changes.
>

Thanks Tom! These applied cleanly to my test env and actually increased my
livejournal graph benchmark by a million edges per second, so I guess I
didn't have all the previous changes in my last build as you noted.

-Michel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Durgamahesh Manne 2025-01-21 18:06:50 Re: Records count mismatch with logical replication
Previous Message Brent Wood 2025-01-21 18:02:01 Re: concatenating hstores in a group by?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-01-21 18:12:05 Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
Previous Message Joe Conway 2025-01-21 17:51:35 Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL