From: | Michel Pelletier <pelletier(dot)michel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql |
Date: | 2025-02-03 03:02:16 |
Message-ID: | CACxu=vJ250gdGF0HPzBEjCX+dDWVvum3P4Vuxg+B_VJ7x69h8A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 1:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Hmm, it seemed to still apply for me. But anyway, I needed to make
> > the other changes, so here's v4.
>
> PFA v5. The new 0001 patch refactors the free_xxx infrastructure
> to create plpgsql_statement_tree_walker(), and then in what's now
> 0003 we can use that instead of writing a lot of duplicate code.
>
Thanks Tom! These patches apply for me and all my tests and benchmarks are
still good.
-Michel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-02-03 05:45:31 | Re: Logging queries executed by SPI_execute |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-03 02:17:03 | Re: What is the story behind _SPI_PLAN_MAGIC? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-02-03 03:04:44 | Re: jsonlog missing from logging_collector description |
Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-02-03 02:58:14 | Re: pgbench with partitioned tables |