Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql

From: Michel Pelletier <pelletier(dot)michel(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
Date: 2025-02-03 03:02:16
Message-ID: CACxu=vJ250gdGF0HPzBEjCX+dDWVvum3P4Vuxg+B_VJ7x69h8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 1:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I wrote:
> > Hmm, it seemed to still apply for me. But anyway, I needed to make
> > the other changes, so here's v4.
>
> PFA v5. The new 0001 patch refactors the free_xxx infrastructure
> to create plpgsql_statement_tree_walker(), and then in what's now
> 0003 we can use that instead of writing a lot of duplicate code.
>

Thanks Tom! These patches apply for me and all my tests and benchmarks are
still good.

-Michel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2025-02-03 05:45:31 Re: Logging queries executed by SPI_execute
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-02-03 02:17:03 Re: What is the story behind _SPI_PLAN_MAGIC?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-02-03 03:04:44 Re: jsonlog missing from logging_collector description
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-02-03 02:58:14 Re: pgbench with partitioned tables