Re: parallel pg_dump

From: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel pg_dump
Date: 2012-04-04 09:03:01
Message-ID: CACw0+11VOZ=5LtSrJMPzwgxd3xjtA1icLHufD-_F+n6AJhji_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> First, either the creation of the destination directory needs to be delayed
> until all the sanity checks have passed and we're sure we're actually going
> to write something there, or it needs to be removed if we error exit before
> anything gets written there.

pg_dump also creates empty files which is the analogous case here.
Just try to dump a nonexistant database for example (this also shows
that delaying won't help...).

> Maybe pg_dump -F d should be prepared to accept an empty directory as well as a
> non-existent directory, just as initdb can.

That sounds like a good compromise. I'll implement that.

> Second, all the PrintStatus traces are annoying and need to be removed, or
> perhaps better only output in debugging mode (using ahlog() instead of just
> printf())

Sure, PrintStatus is just there for now to see what's going on. My
plan was to remove it entirely in the final patch.

Joachim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2012-04-04 09:47:43 bugfix for cursor arguments in named notation
Previous Message Dave Page 2012-04-04 08:51:49 Re: Switching to Homebrew as recommended Mac install?