| From: | Jorge Torralba <jorge(dot)torralba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint |
| Date: | 2018-10-24 22:11:04 |
| Message-ID: | CACut7uS5pRV1=Y-p2q2-udF8BB8xjf4SaHj0BkYWDLBbM6yeRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Wow, thats a convoluted solution and I don't know if it will allow the use
of upsert. I hope this solution is in the works :(
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:05 PM legrand legrand <
legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi
> something similar is already discussed here:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-11-global-index-td6032681.html
>
> Regards
> PAscal
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html
>
>
--
Thanks,
Jorge Torralba
----------------------------
Note: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not print,
copy, retransmit, disseminate or otherwise use the information. Please
indicate to the sender that you have received this email in error and
delete the copy you received. Thank You.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith Fiske | 2018-10-24 22:33:17 | Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint |
| Previous Message | legrand legrand | 2018-10-24 19:04:40 | Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint |