| From: | Ryan Pedela <rpedela(at)datalanche(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Date: | 2015-09-28 22:43:31 |
| Message-ID: | CACu89FT-mj+W7meg_hMZ2k995C+edEBb6Pw2+LMuYFYiqt6BuA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9/28/15 11:43 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> On 2015-09-28 09:41:18 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
>>
>>> Since you're convinced that this is an unqualified win, please put
>>> together a project plan for switching from our current system to
>>> Github.
>>>
>>
>> Err, no. That's a waste of all our time.
>>
>> It has been stated pretty clearly in this thread by a number of senior
>> community people that we're not going to use a closed source system.
>>
>
> GitLab OTOH is released under a MIT license, so it is an option. I don't
> know how it compares to other suggested options, but if YUriy wants to
> propose it it's at least a viable option.
I haven't used Gitlab extensively, but it has a feature set similar to
Github and then some [1]. The OSS project does seem active [2], but it is
still relatively new.
1. https://about.gitlab.com/better-than-github/
2. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-28 22:48:11 | Re: track_commit_timestamp and COMMIT PREPARED |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-28 22:40:47 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |