From: | nunks <nunks(dot)lol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "gaoqiangdba(at)163(dot)com" <gaoqiangdba(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ANALYZE'ing table hierarchies |
Date: | 2016-02-19 13:51:53 |
Message-ID: | CACq6szS7SYipf4dicE24+E8yTP2Am=6XF_Q8Akjfq7j2x1-2Pg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks answering, Tom!
I deal with some big (TB-level) partitioned tables where the application
does a hybrid of querying both the master and the child tables directly.
This clarification will be very useful.
Thank you again!
Nunks
----------
“Life beats down and crushes the soul and art reminds you that you have one.”
- Stella Adler
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> nunks <nunks(dot)lol(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > What eludes me is that part of the documentation says we should analyze
> > each table individually, and another part says we can count on ANALYZE to
> > work on the entire inheritance tree...
>
> Whole-tree stats are a different thing from per-table stats. What
> ANALYZE on a parent table produces is (1) stats for that table alone
> and (2) summary stats for the whole inheritance tree rooted at that table.
> If you want (3) stats for a child table alone then you need to ANALYZE
> that child table by name.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-02-19 13:56:56 | Re: 9.5 new setting "cluster name" and logging |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-19 13:32:46 | Re: ANALYZE'ing table hierarchies |