Re: Strange dump/restore effect

Try just loading the 1.5 dump directly into the 2.0 database without
the filtering step. It will be immensely noisy with lots of errors and
warnings, but with luck you should find your data is there waiting for
you when it's done.

P

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Gražvydas Valeika <gvaleika(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just migrated to 9.2 and observing stange thing.
>
> While restoring 9.2 database to another server's empty database I'm getting
> several errors while restoring views:
>
> pg_restore: creating RULE _RETURN
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 5466; 2618 26660 RULE
> _RETURN postgres
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: syntax error at
> or near ")"
> LINE 2: ALTER VIEW v_vehicle SET ();
> ^
> Command was: CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS ON SELECT TO v_vehicle DO INSTEAD
> SELECT v.vehicle_id, v.vehicle_code, v.home_location_id, v.vehicl...
> pg_restore: creating RULE _RETURN
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 5487; 2618 26835 RULE
> _RETURN postgres
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: syntax error at
> or near ")"
> LINE 2: ALTER VIEW v_r_delivery SET ();
>
> There is lot of views, other are backuped/restored without problems.
> Those several views which are restored with errors are visible in new
> database as empty tables.
>
> Source database is produced by PostGIS 2.0 migration script from 9.1/PostGIS
> 1.5 database backup. Attempt to drop those strange views, recreate them and
> then run dump/restore doesn't change anything.
>
>
> Same backup/restore procedure worked fine in 9.1.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Grazvydas
>
>