From: | akp geek <akpgeek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need some help on Performance 9.0.4 |
Date: | 2013-10-13 15:43:32 |
Message-ID: | CACnhOf+5yd=sUYHOz7yeFS73Ab6VRBxHWMw3rwq-y1RRDWGPKA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sorry all not posting clear. I posted our postresql.conf file. What we are
having is very slow response from the database.
would like to get some feedback about postgresql.conf file parameters that
I posted are causing the issue for performance of the DB.
Our database is about 60GB and performance is very bad.
pci, instance #5
pci, instance #5
load averages: 17.5, 18.1, 18.6; up
673+23:00:23
16:33:58
156 processes: 140 sleeping, 16 on cpu
CPU states: 76.5% idle, 22.8% user, 0.7% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 64G phys mem, 19G free mem, 63G total swap, 63G free swap
Regards
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:56 AM, akp geek <akpgeek(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > We have been running 4 of our applications on 9.0.4, which we are
> planning
> > to update the database 9.2.2 by the year end. we have the streaming
> > replication also running
> 9.2.4 has fixed a severe security problem. If you do not want to
> expose your cluster to that, you should at least upgrade to this
> version.
> And posting a question would be better...
> --
> Michael
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bricklen | 2013-10-13 15:47:04 | Re: Need some help on Performance 9.0.4 |
Previous Message | akp geek | 2013-10-13 15:35:37 | Re: postgres 9.0.4 configuration and performance issue |