| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Benjamin Toueg <btoueg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Perf decreased although server is better |
| Date: | 2016-11-02 14:38:44 |
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsPzvhx5Za3esrWyLh-orM-zMNHGVRMB=9LC0mPdt1xOsw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Benjamin Toueg <btoueg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm facing a peformance decrease after switching to a more performant VPS :
In my world, the VPS that performs worse is not considered "more
performant", no matter what the sales materials say.
> What benchmark should I perform before switching to a new server?
Personally, I always like to run bonnie++ and the STREAM RAM test
before even installing the database software.
> What's your rule of thumb regarding my specific issue? What should be
> investigated first?
I would start by comparing the results of both of the
above-mentioned tests for the two environments.
Just one observation, based on the limited data -- a higher network
latency between the client and the database might explain what
you've presented. I would check that, too.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rick Otten | 2016-11-02 14:55:52 | Re: Perf decreased although server is better |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-11-02 14:36:25 | Re: Perf decreased although server is better |