Re: snapbuild woes

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2016-12-11 16:36:17
Message-ID: CACjxUsOtcQe1omhs_qQT_bT=PPj9d65cyb_916yZa=q_50m3bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this
>>> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen
>>> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't
>>> reach consistency yet.
>>
>> Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct.
>
> Attached no patch second time?

I see an attachment, and it shows in the archives.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aee1d499-e3ca-e091-56da-1ee6a47741c8%402ndquadrant.com

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-12-11 17:23:02 Re: proposal: psql statements \gstore \gstore_binary (instead COPY RAW)
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2016-12-11 10:52:26 Re: jsonb problematic operators