Re: snapshot too old, configured by time

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Date: 2016-04-18 12:31:10
Message-ID: CACjxUsO4bZ9798atgtUycaSwc42=LD7_hdPx9EkR1b3rGqq4Dg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> After struggling with back-patching a GIN bug fix, I wish to offer up the
>> considered opinion that this was an impressively bad idea. It's inserted
>> 450 or so pain points for back-patching, which we will have to deal with
>> for the next five years.

> I understand the backpatching pain argument, but my opinion was the
> contrary of yours even so.

The other possibility would be to backpatch the no-op patch which
just uses the new syntax without any change in semantics.

I'm not arguing for that; just putting it on the table....

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-18 13:17:46 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add trigonometric functions that work in degrees.
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-04-18 12:15:19 Re: Suspicious behaviour on applying XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE.