Re: Serializable isolation -- are predicate locks still held across all databases?

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Serializable isolation -- are predicate locks still held across all databases?
Date: 2017-05-19 14:31:02
Message-ID: CACjxUsNb2aF6D1nfqU=vSn-s2EG6ahGscwQMX4=XW56xssyCeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Karl O. Pinc <kop(at)meme(dot)com> wrote:

> I think if I was to make an argument for doing something it would
> be based on reliability -- how many users can you give their
> own database before somebody leaves an open transaction hanging?

Yeah, I guess it's worth having on the list, where it will compete
with other possible enhancements on a cost/benefit basis. Thanks
for raising the issue!

--
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-05-19 15:22:52 Re: Encrypt with BouncyCastle and decrypt with pg_pub_decrypt
Previous Message John R Pierce 2017-05-19 14:10:17 Re: Weird periodical pg log