Re: Improve tab completion for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve tab completion for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
Date: 2016-01-26 14:43:16
Message-ID: CACjxUsNRJDOvS6g5GUuam-x1qZ3amj0YDiBpCP_2gO7zMGA_tA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>> While testing the patch, I found that
>> REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW <tab> doesn't list the materialized views.
>
> This is not true. Sorry for the noise...

But CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW <tab> doesn't list existing matviews.
I'm not clear on why it's a good idea to do so, but most kinds of
objects (including tables, views, and indexes) do so; so it seems
best to follow suit here. I will push something shortly with the
improvements from both of you, plus a couple other MV tab
completion issues I found in testing these patches.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-01-26 14:43:30 Re: pglogical - logical replication contrib module
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-01-26 14:42:33 Re: Releasing in September