Re: unique constraint with several null values

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Lybarger <mlybarger(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unique constraint with several null values
Date: 2016-07-20 19:16:42
Message-ID: CACjxUsN=CW2bJXSAcQcGe_Q=Y4N+scKKt-eh5y3fcdt2xPSuzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:48 PM, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Mark Lybarger <mlybarger(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>> Another solution I can think of is to just use a trigger to
>> prevent the duplicate rows.

If you go that route you will need to use serializable
transactions, explicit locking, or trigger-based update of some
otherwise-unneeded column to avoid race conditions. See:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/mvcc.html

That can be a perfectly valid option as long as you handle race
conditions somehow.

>> Any thoughts are certainly appreciated. I can't do much about
>> the data model itself right now, I need to protect the integrity
>> of the data.

Rather than unique constraints, you could add a unique index on the
COALESCE of each column with some impossible value.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2016-07-20 19:44:08 Re: unique constraint with several null values
Previous Message dangal 2016-07-20 18:53:37 High Availability