| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Mark Lybarger <mlybarger(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: unique constraint with several null values | 
| Date: | 2016-07-20 19:16:42 | 
| Message-ID: | CACjxUsN=CW2bJXSAcQcGe_Q=Y4N+scKKt-eh5y3fcdt2xPSuzg@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:48 PM, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Mark Lybarger <mlybarger(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Another solution I can think of is to just use a trigger to
>> prevent the duplicate rows.
If you go that route you will need to use serializable
transactions, explicit locking, or trigger-based update of some
otherwise-unneeded column to avoid race conditions.  See:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/mvcc.html
That can be a perfectly valid option as long as you handle race
conditions somehow.
>> Any thoughts are certainly appreciated.  I can't do much about
>> the data model itself right now, I need to protect the integrity
>> of the data.
Rather than unique constraints, you could add a unique index on the
COALESCE of each column with some impossible value.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jerry Sievers | 2016-07-20 19:44:08 | Re: unique constraint with several null values | 
| Previous Message | dangal | 2016-07-20 18:53:37 | High Availability |