From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Question about behavior of snapshot too old feature |
Date: | 2016-10-19 16:15:38 |
Message-ID: | CACjxUsMVF3cuRi9eyO6TxNyB=Ba0t5Y+EwrGFSK=-BU2jkbuFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:08:28AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>>> Slide 10 of this presentation has an example showing
>>> old_snapshot_threshold set to '1min':
>>>
>>> http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/features.pdf
>>
>> If the presentation is intending to show reasonable values for
>> production use, that would be better as, maybe, '2h'.
> The example is just to illustrate the activities required to trigger it,
> e.g. pg_sleep(), VACUUM.
Yeah, in such a demonstration you probably don't want to have
everyone sit for 2 hours, so 1 minute makes perfect sense. :-)
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-19 16:20:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] packing/alignment annotation for ItemPointerData redux |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2016-10-19 16:14:52 | packing/alignment annotation for ItemPointerData redux |