From: | "Jake O'brien Fagan" <jake(at)househappy(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jayadevan <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Better use of memory |
Date: | 2014-08-01 16:04:45 |
Message-ID: | CACjsCgRCcmSLt5Mh0KXbwprJ4w4F82_Q8wBg0d-vbv3UzZoJ-w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
No issue with response times. At least I think not. Looking at NewRelic,
the database generally responds in <10ms. My data is currently >150GB, and
it seems odd the server's memory usage never tops 1500MB when many of my
key settings are far greater than few GBs. Should I not worry?
------------------------------
Jake O'Brien Fagan
Ruby Engineer
househappy.org <http://www.househappy.org/>
Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/househappy.org> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/househappy> | Instagram
<http://instagram.com/househappy>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Jayadevan <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Are you have issues with response time? Which stats are telling you that
> memory is not being utilized effectively?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Better-use-of-memory-tp5813477p5813487.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - novice mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jayadevan | 2014-08-02 04:03:09 | Re: Better use of memory |
Previous Message | Jayadevan | 2014-08-01 04:07:35 | Re: Better use of memory |