From: | Venakata Ramana <ramana(dot)pls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reg. Restore |
Date: | 2013-10-08 06:52:17 |
Message-ID: | CACiDZ3XSecTtMY49EDXnk1=4BcLfMXAGbAakQeWOsGYaw9x2Ag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks for your reply.
---> You should update to a more current minor release.
Recently I updated to 9.1.5. I will do in near future.
--> You need to provide more information on how you backed up, how you
are restoring, and what the bottleneck seems to be.
I am pg_restore using for restoring the backup which created using pg_dump.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Ramana
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> Venakata Ramana <ramana(dot)pls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I am using postgresql 9.1.5. on windows Xp.
>
> You should update to a more current minor release.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
>
> > 1. Restore of DB is very slow.
> > How to improve the speed of Restore?
>
> You need to provide more information on how you backed up, how you
> are restoring, and what the bottleneck seems to be.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/backup.html
>
>
> > 2. Without indexes, retrieving from table is fast?
> > After creating an index on that table, then the retrieval
> > become slow.
>
> There's not enough information to give much advice. Please read
> this page and start a new thread on the pgsql-performance list:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SlowQueryQuestions
>
> --
> Kevin Grittner
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jaime soler | 2013-10-08 08:44:52 | Re: postgres connections in IDLE state.. |
Previous Message | Venakata Ramana | 2013-10-08 05:43:01 | Re: Reg. Restore |