From: | Pavan Teja <pavan(dot)postgresdba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vikas Sharma <shavikas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FATAL: failed to create a backend connection |
Date: | 2018-02-02 12:47:44 |
Message-ID: | CACh9nsZhKoknZ6DYbJoXjzyajMojN2X_xABxwnMXp+UMQLrn_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Feb 2, 2018 5:57 PM, "Vikas Sharma" <shavikas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
Hi There,
We are using Postgresql 9.3 with pgpool-II-93-3.5.10.
One Master replicating to 3 Standbys using streaming replication. Pgpool is
used for load balancing only.
Lately we are seeing below on application servers.
Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: FATAL: failed to create a
backend connection
Detail: executing failover on backend
Are we hitting the max_connections in PgSql instance or pgpool has reached
to max_connections and can't spawn more
Please advise.
Regards
Vikas
Hi,
It seems like there is a disagreement between postgres and
pgpool as to where the Unix domain sockets for talking to postgres ought to
be found.
It's a situation like it can connect to postgres buy not pgpool, as it was
directing all traffic to the local postgres node.
1) Check whether any of the postgres backends are cancelling query with
'statement time out' error.
2) If statement time out is not set in postgres.conf file then the
application might have altered.
3) Check for any long running queries are being cancelled by Server.
Regards,
Pavan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rowan Seymour | 2018-02-02 15:26:46 | Increasing size of array items without locking |
Previous Message | Vikas Sharma | 2018-02-02 12:27:18 | FATAL: failed to create a backend connection |