From: | Pavan Teja <pavan(dot)postgresdba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rui DeSousa <rui(dot)desousa(at)icloud(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 'Corruption & Fragmentation' detection and resolution/fix |
Date: | 2018-06-11 18:18:27 |
Message-ID: | CACh9nsYOacwJ6D_sVenarjpVNNXgDdhSP-bFpdXVmoms5fkLOw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Rui,
Thank you for the clarification.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 11:46 PM Rui DeSousa <rui(dot)desousa(at)icloud(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 11, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Pavan Teja <pavan(dot)postgresdba(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > So finally there's no script to determine corruption well in advance??
> Correct??
>
> It is your responsibility to make sure that the system is solid and all
> worst cases are covered along with striving for the five 9’s. You need to
> building a system that you can trust which includes making sure you disk
> subsystem is really and I mean really reliable. RAID is the most falsely
> trusted system around; so you really need to know the subsystems in your
> system especially when subsystems that break fsync().
>
> Bit rot is real and if you system doesn’t handle it then that will lead to
> data corruption. Postgres will only be able to tell you that it occurred
> if you have data_checksums feature enabled. Your subsystem should handle
> it and actively be checking for it; however, most RAID systems don’t or
> fail to do a good job at it.
>
> Like I stated already; If I couldn’t entrust the data integrity of
> Postgres I would not be using it and would be running Oracle instead.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rui DeSousa | 2018-06-11 19:05:10 | Re: pg_stat_activity |
Previous Message | Rui DeSousa | 2018-06-11 18:16:29 | Re: PostgreSQL 'Corruption & Fragmentation' detection and resolution/fix |