From: | Víctor Cosqui <victor(dot)cosqui(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Doubt with physical storage being used by postgres when storing LOBs |
Date: | 2013-10-02 16:08:29 |
Message-ID: | CACg6vWUi0KrsoQ42-X+YB3Z5UV-S9Jq_RhyrmOE3HNrmmWrf2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi all
I am developing an application which uses postgres 9.2 to store binaries as
oid objects.
CREATE TABLE content (contentname text, contentoid oid);
I am making some tests to evaluate how much HD space I will need to
allocate these objects.
To measure the space used by postgres I have used two different tools, both
with the same results
1.- Checking physical HD space by making a "sudo du -sb
/opt/PostgreSQL/9.2/data/base/" before and after inserting the data
2.- Asking directly postgres about the tables size estimation "select
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('pg_largeobject'))"
I have tested with different binaries and I am getting different results,
for example when I put the content of a zipped file of 17MB size, the
increment of the disk space is of 24MB. The reason for this increment seems
to be an index created on the table "pg_largeobject". The index is
"pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index"
In other hand when I put let's say many zeroes (same 17Mb) the increase of
HD usage is much smaller.
I think it could be caused because TOAST compresses the content stored, se
he can compress the zeroes but not the previously compressed zip content.
My question is: Is this increase of ~40% normal? Has someone else
experienced this?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Víctor Cosqui
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto | 2013-10-02 16:22:27 | Re: [GENERAL] Help on ṕerformance |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-10-02 16:08:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Who is pgFoundery administrator? |