From: | Joe Van Dyk <joe(at)tanga(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: adding a nullable column of type domain w/ check constraint runs checks? |
Date: | 2014-08-19 22:20:10 |
Message-ID: | CACfv+p+rZQwYE1-nBxSaJLVGVCAYveWccmBGOhCduhnUOU2d2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Joe Van Dyk <joe(at)tanga(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joe Van Dyk <joe(at)tanga(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I have a large table that I don't want to lock for more than couple
>> seconds. I want to add a nullable column to the table, the type of the
>> column is a domain with a check constraint.
>>
>> It appears that the check constraint is being checked for each row, even
>> though the column can be nullable? Is there a way around this?
>>
>> BEGIN
>> Timing is on.
>>
>> create domain test_enum numeric check (value > 0);
>> CREATE DOMAIN
>> Time: 1.817 ms
>>
>> create table test_enum_table (id serial primary key);
>> CREATE TABLE
>> Time: 2.213 ms
>>
>> insert into test_enum_table select * from generate_series(1, 2000000);
>> INSERT 0 2000000
>> Time: 4299.000 ms
>>
>> alter table test_enum_table add column t test_enum;
>> ALTER TABLE
>> Time: 3165.869 ms -- Takes 3 seconds in this test example
>>
>> Also:
>
> alter table test_enum_table add column t1 numeric check (t1 > 0);
> ALTER TABLE
> Time: 140.185 ms
>
> which is much more reasonable.
>
johnto on irc says:
"I'm not sure why it's done this way. it seems like it could test the
domain once against NULL and see whether that's rejected or not. instead
it just forces a rewrite :-("
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-08-19 22:27:39 | Re: Extended Prefetching using Asynchronous IO - proposal and patch |
Previous Message | Joe Van Dyk | 2014-08-19 22:16:37 | Re: adding a nullable column of type domain w/ check constraint runs checks? |