From: | Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher |
Date: | 2022-10-21 12:14:09 |
Message-ID: | CACawEhUUHcSVhp-bODSAnYNUQHY=4gvY29DXM=yuphgrkcqqmQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Shi yu, all
> In execReplication.c:
>
> + TypeCacheEntry **eq = NULL; /* only used when the index is not
> unique */
>
> Maybe the comment here should be changed. Now it is used when the index is
> not
> primary key or replica identity index.
>
>
makes sense, updated
> 2.
> +# wait until the index is created
> +$node_subscriber->poll_query_until(
> + 'postgres', q{select count(*)=1 from pg_stat_all_indexes where
> indexrelname = 'test_replica_id_full_idx';}
> +) or die "Timed out while waiting for check subscriber tap_sub_rep_full
> updates one row via index";
>
> The message doesn't seem right, should it be changed to "Timed out while
> waiting for creating index test_replica_id_full_idx"?
>
yes, updated
>
> 3.
> +# now, ingest more data and create index on column y which has higher
> cardinality
> +# then create an index on column y so that future commands uses the index
> on column
> +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres',
> + "INSERT INTO test_replica_id_full SELECT 50, i FROM
> generate_series(0,3100)i;");
>
> The comment say "create (an) index on column y" twice, maybe it can be
> changed
> to:
>
> now, ingest more data and create index on column y which has higher
> cardinality,
> so that future commands will use the index on column y
>
>
fixed
> 4.
> +# deletes 200 rows
> +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres',
> + "DELETE FROM test_replica_id_full WHERE x IN (5, 6);");
> +
> +# wait until the index is used on the subscriber
> +$node_subscriber->poll_query_until(
> + 'postgres', q{select (idx_scan = 200) from pg_stat_all_indexes
> where indexrelname = 'test_replica_id_full_idx';}
> +) or die "Timed out while waiting for check subscriber tap_sub_rep_full
> updates 200 rows via index";
>
> It would be better to call wait_for_catchup() after DELETE. (And some other
> places in this file.)
>
Hmm, I cannot follow this easily.
Why do you think wait_for_catchup() should be called? In general, I tried
to follow a pattern where we call poll_query_until() so that we are sure
that all the changes are replicated via the index. And then, an
additional check with `is($result, ..` such that we also verify the
correctness of the data.
One alternative could be to use wait_for_catchup() and then have multiple
`is($result, ..` to check both pg_stat_all_indexes and the correctness of
the data.
One minor advantage I see with the current approach is that every
`is($result, ..` adds one step to the test. So, if I use `is($result, ..`
for pg_stat_all_indexes queries, then I'd be adding multiple steps for a
single test. It felt it is more natural/common to test roughly once with
`is($result, ..` on each test. Or, at least do not add additional ones for
pg_stat_all_indexes checks.
> Besides, the "updates" in the message should be "deletes".
>
>
fixed
> 5.
> +# wait until the index is used on the subscriber
> +$node_subscriber->poll_query_until(
> + 'postgres', q{select sum(idx_scan)=10 from pg_stat_all_indexes
> where indexrelname ilike 'users_table_part_%';}
> +) or die "Timed out while waiting for check subscriber tap_sub_rep_full
> updates partitioned table";
>
> Maybe we should say "updates partitioned table with index" in this message.
>
>
Fixed
Attached v20.
Thanks!
Onder KALACI
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v20_0001_use_index_on_subs_when_pub_rep_ident_full.patch | application/octet-stream | 87.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-10-21 12:34:35 | Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y |
Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2022-10-21 12:10:37 | Re: Patch proposal: make use of regular expressions for the username in pg_hba.conf |