From: | William Ivanski <william(dot)ivanski(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Trim performance on 9.5 |
Date: | 2016-11-18 14:06:36 |
Message-ID: | CACaWZ9SPTAhY9-Uxucs2692V=-uSc7tBiW8V3Qu0bT6GLkDxdQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I recently did major improvements on perfomance on our routines by simply
removing the call for trim functions on specific bottlenecks. Please see
images attached for a simple example.
I'm using PostgreSQL version 9.5.5-1.pgdg80+1 on Debian 8.6. Someone knows
if it's a bug on trim function? Thanks in advance.
--
William Ivanski
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
![]() |
image/png | 20.5 KB |
![]() |
image/png | 22.9 KB |
![]() |
image/png | 18.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vinny | 2016-11-18 14:16:33 | Re: Trim performance on 9.5 |
Previous Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2016-11-18 14:06:05 | Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL? |