| From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's the state of postgresql on ext4 now? |
| Date: | 2011-11-16 03:54:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAC_2qU_Xy5r_5JBeFLHKugN2vBx61dQnP9QW5_ohCXG-wHWntA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> In just about every other way
> but commit performance, ext4 is faster than most other filesystems.
As someone who is looked at as an expert and knowledgable my many of
us, are you getting to the point of migrating large XFS filesystems to
ext4 for production databases yet? Or at least using ext4 in new
large-scale filesystems for PG?
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-11-16 03:55:17 | Re: What's the state of postgresql on ext4 now? |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-11-16 03:48:07 | Re: What's the state of postgresql on ext4 now? |