From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: mosbench revisited |
Date: | 2011-08-04 21:09:02 |
Message-ID: | CAC_2qU_4ftYZVg-e0s2Zvb5GOtyH-Vdg-aS+FsoSx5Tk2dD3Kg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> And hoping that the Linux guys decide to do something about it.
> This isn't really our bug - lseek is quite cheap in the uncontended
> case.
Has anyone tried this on a recent kernel (i.e. 2.6.39 or later), where
they've finally remove the BKL out of VFS/inode?
I mean, complaining about scalability in linux 2.6.18 is like
complaining about scalability in postgresql 8.2 ;-)
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | daveg | 2011-08-04 21:09:43 | Re: error: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-08-04 21:03:23 | Re: Reduce WAL logging of INSERT SELECT |