From: | Everaldo Canuto <everaldo(dot)canuto(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Vérité <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |
Date: | 2017-12-08 14:26:22 |
Message-ID: | CACYgWUkGw9q55MdsaHUd27QxdUMiioWrP=gxGA89+iKojFb0Qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Daniel Vérité" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
wrote:
> Implementing it is easy, but it might be a hard sell for the project
> because it creates a precedent.
>
We already have "help" (without slash) so I don't think it is a precedent.
> The next question in that list is "PostgreSQL DESCRIBE TABLE", so
> why not implement "desc tablename;" as a synonym for
> "\d tablename"?
>
I must be honest to you, I create this small patch to see how is contribute
do Postgres and to check how is reception on Postgres community.
That said, DESC[RIBE] is on my list for next patches but it is not a
synonym to \d.
DESC[RIBE] must be a SQL command, very useful when you are not running
psql. But let us discuss this on another thread ;-)
> The question after that is "Show tables in PostgreSQL", so
> why not implement "show tablename;"? Well, this one is
> impossible because SHOW is already a SQL command that does
> something else, so that's already the end of that road to
> compatibility.
>
Didn't know about SHOW command. Are TABLES a reserved word?
Regards.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Ford | 2017-12-08 14:34:01 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |
Previous Message | Ryan Murphy | 2017-12-08 14:10:35 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |