From: | Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal to include --exclude-extension Flag in pg_dump |
Date: | 2024-01-01 13:28:14 |
Message-ID: | CACX+KaOyfNaY+EQSYEa-Yecfs=zdnNTZx=peR9R00PccO2xZvg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> Aren't extensions excluded by default? That's why we have --extension.
According to the documentation of pg_dump when the --extension option is
not specified, all non-system extensions in the target database will get
dumped.
> Why do we need to explicitly exclude extensions?
Hence to include only a few we use --extension, but to exclude a few I am
proposing --exclude-extension.
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 at 18:18, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 3:48 PM Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi PostgreSQL Community,
> > Recently I have been working on pg_dump regarding my project and wanted
> to exclude an extension from the dump generated. I wonder why it doesn't
> have --exclude-extension type of support whereas --extension exists!
> > Since I needed that support, I took the initiative to contribute to the
> community by adding the --exclude-extension flag.
>
> Aren't extensions excluded by default? That's why we have --extension.
> Why do we need to explicitly exclude extensions?
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Fan | 2024-01-01 13:55:02 | Re: Shared detoast Datum proposal |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-01-01 12:49:43 | Re: Autonomous transactions 2023, WIP |