From: | VASUKI M <vasukim1992002(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bugs status tracking |
Date: | 2025-02-22 09:45:58 |
Message-ID: | CACTYHzh4L47963dxWT0sWbAJuRbCH8CVxVO4taj+Cyvt_EoR3Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Greg,
Thank you for your response and feedback.
I have created a *demo repository* for tracking pgsql-bugs reports:
🔗 GitHub Repository
<https://github.com/Vasuki-git/mailing-lists/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20sort%3Aupdated-desc>
The goal of this repo is to provide a *structured view* of bug reports from
the pgsql-bugs mailing list while ensuring that all discussions continue in
the mailing list itself. Each GitHub issue contains details such as
the *subject,
date, and message ID* to help contributors quickly find and respond to the
original thread.
I understand that this is just an initial *proof of concept*, and I welcome
any feedback or suggestions on improving the workflow. I appreciate your
advice, and I’ll iterate on this based on community input.
Looking forward to your thoughts!
Best,
Vasuki
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 20:01, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 2:47 AM VASUKI M <vasukim1992002(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Please can u tell whether it is ok or not or do we need to change
>> anything ,as of now the community is bigger and we have people to track the
>> status so please give suggestions or corrections.
>>
>
> All of our data is public and free to use, so you are welcome to do with
> it what you want.
>
> I would suggest just creating a proof of concept and let's see what it
> looks like. Nobody is going to officially bless it beforehand. Being able
> to see and critique an actual workflow is invaluable.
>
> Be warned that no matter what you come up with, not everyone will be happy
> with it. That's the nature of things, so don't be discouraged.
>
> Cheers,
> Greg
>
> --
> Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
> Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2025-02-22 11:45:43 | BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature |
Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2025-02-22 03:08:35 | Re: Query result differences between PostgreSQL 17 vs 16 |