From: | Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function array_agg(array) |
Date: | 2014-10-19 06:02:55 |
Message-ID: | CACQjQLrPfFYn352v4A2Ho=D=RYtCX5x1SSbz3cpJrxOra6Gs5g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> So, is there any idea how we will handle NULL and empty array in
> array_agg(anyarray)?
> I propose we just reject those input because the output will make no sense:
> - array_agg(NULL::int[]) --> the result will be indistinguished from
> array_agg of NULL ints.
> - array_agg('{}'::int[]) --> how we determine the dimension of the result?
> is it 0? Or the result will be just an empty array {} ?
>
This updated patch rejects NULL and {} arrays as noted above.
Regards,
--
Ali Akbar
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
array_agg_anyarray-3.patch | text/x-patch | 12.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-10-19 07:54:27 | Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-10-19 02:36:48 | Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables |