From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |
Date: | 2019-02-03 19:09:14 |
Message-ID: | CACPNZCvP9pdCapmeOTUw23rxeSC5i2X2tvEdTqgG4Kfecfkg8g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 2:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This doesn't get applied cleanly after recent commit 0d1fe9f74e.
> Attached is a rebased version. I have checked once that the changes
> done by 0d1fe9f74e don't impact this patch. John, see if you can also
> once confirm whether the recent commit (0d1fe9f74e) has any impact. I
> am planning to push this tomorrow morning (IST) unless you or anyone
> see any problem with this.
Since that commit changes RelationAddExtraBlocks(), which can be
induces by your pgbench adjustment upthread, I ran make check with
that adjustment in the pgbench dir 300 times without triggering
asserts.
I also tried to follow the logic in 0d1fe9f74e, and I believe it will
be correct without a FSM.
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Wagner | 2019-02-03 21:13:53 | Re: bug tracking system |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2019-02-03 17:36:50 | Re: Synchronize with imath upstream |