From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
Date: | 2020-08-24 07:28:17 |
Message-ID: | CACPNZCv3ysYV5i9Bzb0o1TYTVKu3cH_+UnHDDEcoTWKJVKABqw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:03 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > What are the thoughts about then marking the postfix operator deprecated
> > and eventually removing it?
>
> If we do this it'd require a plan. We'd have to also warn about the
> feature deprecation in (at least) the CREATE OPERATOR man page, and
> we'd have to decide how many release cycles the deprecation notices
> need to stand for.
>
> If that's the intention, though, it'd be good to get those deprecation
> notices published in v13 not v14.
I imagine the release candidates are not too far away by now, and if
we are confident enough in the direction the patches in this thread
are going, we should probably consider a deprecation notice soon.
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuro Yamada | 2020-08-24 07:41:32 | Re: list of extended statistics on psql |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-08-24 07:18:36 | Re: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions |