Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Date: 2019-02-23 07:54:18
Message-ID: CACPNZCsWa=dd0K+FiODwM=LEsepAHVJCoSx2Avew=xBEX3Ywjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:27 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I think this test is going to break on nonstandard block sizes. While
> we don't promise that all tests work on such installs (particularly
> planner ones), it seems fairly easy to cope with this one -- just use a
> record size expressed as a fraction of current_setting('block_size').
> So instead of "1024" you'd write current_setting('block_size') / 8.
> And then display the relation size in terms of pages, not bytes, so
> divide pg_relation_size by block size.

I've done this for v6, tested on 16k block size.

--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Add-more-tests-for-FSM.patch text/x-patch 8.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2019-02-23 08:01:11 Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2019-02-23 07:53:36 Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option