From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg(at)bec(dot)de>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |
Date: | 2019-01-08 22:16:21 |
Message-ID: | CACPNZCsMRrgVkVGosK3UbgnwGHS4jT1_vOfJMHNi1n+s0sC14w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:04 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I'll take a crack at separating into a module. I'll wait a bit in
> > case there are any stylistic suggestions on the patch as it stands.
>
> I had a go at that myself. I'm sure there's plenty to criticize in
> the result, but at least it passes make check-world ;-)
Just a couple comments about the module:
-If you qualify the function's module name as you did
(PerfectHash::generate_hash_function), you don't have to export the
function into the callers namespace, so you can skip the @EXPORT_OK
setting. Most of our modules don't export.
-There is a bit of a cognitive clash between $case_sensitive in
gen_keywordlist.pl and $case_insensitive in PerfectHash.pm. They each
make sense in their own file, but might it be worth using one or the
other?
-As for the graph algorithm, I'd have to play with it to understand
how it works.
In the committed keyword patch, I noticed that in common/keywords.c,
the array length is defined with
ScanKeywordCategories[SCANKEYWORDS_NUM_KEYWORDS]
but other keyword arrays just have ...[]. Is there a reason for the difference?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2019-01-08 22:26:09 | Re: Statement-level Triggers For Uniqueness Checks |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-08 21:54:06 | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) |