Re: Postgres listens on random port

From: Kal <kalel(dot)code11(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Saul Perdomo <saul(dot)perdomo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres listens on random port
Date: 2024-11-05 14:34:24
Message-ID: CACO9DYJuXdaHL338ZftaQWM-ZR_DLq0Wpg-y3krzwOBai3eXsA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi

The netstat command did not reveal any entries on the intended port (say
5460). The 5460 port was vacant, no processes were using it.
I had to crawl through the postgres processes on task manager to find the
listening port.

Could this be due interference from other services? But the port 5460
remains unused.

Regards,
Kal

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 7:57 PM, Saul Perdomo <saul(dot)perdomo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> " But the database actually listens on some random port like 20011"
>
> How exactly did you determine this?
>
> (If you used, say, netstat, can you share its output with us?)
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 8:46 AM Kal <kalel(dot)code11(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have a scenario in which postgres listens on a random port different
>> from the one which was specified in pg_ctl start command.
>>
>> This occurs in windows. When postgres is started on port 5460, the logs
>> denote that postgres is started on 5460. But the database actually listens
>> on some random port like 20011
>>
>> When the same postgres is started as a service,it listens on the intended
>> port.
>>
>> I have tried with both normal and admin users.
>>
>> Any suggestions on this behaviour will be helpful.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kal
>>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2024-11-05 14:40:47 Re: Postgres listens on random port
Previous Message Saul Perdomo 2024-11-05 14:26:46 Re: Postgres listens on random port